#Blackmagic disk speed test results full#
#Blackmagic disk speed test results pro#

SpeedOut will then run 4 passes for both reading and writing tests and display the average for each. Again, if you are using multiple 8K streams at once, you can effectively divide the framerate according to how many you implement.The scores can be saved or copied by right clicking on the title bar. The 3900X from AMD does spice things up, though, as it beats out the 9900K easily with its extra cores, despite costing the same (roughly $500).ģ:1 compression is the most challenging of them all, but even so, on higher-end components, the performance may not change that much, indicating that you’re probably using a processor with a ton of headroom. The 9900K beats out the 3700X, and 8700K beats 3600X (despite being a generation older). Intel core-for-core match-ups, team blue leads the pack.

#Blackmagic disk speed test results pro#

Our Premiere Pro tests have also shown good gain on Zen 2 over the previous-gen, so if it’s not the cache making improvements, it’s the architectural updates in general. It seems all of that extra cache in Zen 2 might impact image manipulation tests more than video encoders, though this is just one test. Whereas AMD’s Zen 2 excelled in our Adobe Lightroom test, some Intel chips regain the lead here. We’ll tackle GPU soon, and expect to introduce this benchmark also into our workstation GPU reviews. Nonetheless, let’s get to CPU performance and see how this test scales: This test supports both CPUs and GPUs, but for the time-being, we’re focusing on CPU, as we ran these tests at the same time as our Adobe Lightroom ones. This is the case so that people can use their PCs as this test runs, and better understand how certain processes may detrimentally impact playback performance.

#Blackmagic disk speed test results full#

The reason you can choose a specific test for the gauges is because that test will continually run even after the full suite is run. With RAW Speed Test, the gauges up top reflect your target resolution and compression rate, but everything will be tested regardless of what’s chosen. We feel like we’re beating a dead horse here, but threading anomalies that can occur with those chips is the easiest thing to blame. There were some cases on certain CPUs where one run would vary slightly, with it primarily being seen on the Threadripper series. It also completes tests ridiculously fast, but despite that, repeated runs tend to give results accurate within 1 FPS across the board. In effect, if you manage to hit 90 FPS in one test, that should effectively mean you could hit up to 3x 8K/30 (although you wouldn’t have any headroom left).īlackmagic RAW Speed Test appears to use application traces to test performance, because it’s a super small benchmark and doesn’t bundle in a single real media file. That’s even in the event your source footage is less than 60 FPS, because it’s not uncommon to double up on streams in production for side-by-side action (or picture-in-picture).

BM says that if your target resolution and compression ratio passes the 60 FPS mark, then it can be considered “ideal”. Little did we realize, Blackmagic released BRAW Speed Test last month, and while it takes no time to run, it seems to give reasonable results, and most importantly, repeatable and scalable results. While we plan to integrate real-world DaVinci Resolve testing soon, we wanted to get something added into the next suite revision since our tests are not quite built yet. Lightroom is one (re)addition that’s being made, while Blackmagic RAW Speed Test is another.

As we talked about yesterday in our post taking a look at strong Zen 2 performance in Adobe Lightroom, we mentioned that we’ve been augmenting our test suite for the next set of CPU launches.